liam_on_linux: (Default)
2019-10-23 12:04 pm

Found a lost piece of my own work! A RH 6.2 review from PCW, August 2000

Stumbled across this in the Internet Archive...

Red Hat Linux 6.2 Deluxe

Red Hat used to be a big fish in a small pond, but version 6.2 must prove itself seaworthy.

Red Hat is one ofthe longest-established Linux distributions and the first to be split into packages - archived bundles containing all the programs and supplementary files forming an application, allowing the user to add, remove or upgrade individual subsystems in a single operation. This modularity and upgradability made it the first Linux for non-experts and proved highly successful, to the extent that it remains the most widely used distribution in America and, in some ways, the de facto 'standard’ Linux.

In the past few years, though, rival distributions have surpassed it in some areas and the company’s rigorous stance against including commercial components has imposed some restrictions.

Now Red Hat is playing catch-up. Version 6.0 moved to the 2.2 kernel and version 6.1 aped Caldera and added a graphical installation program, Anaconda. This latest version, 6.2 (codenamed Zoot), smoothes out some wrinkles caused by these changes, adds an interactive startup sequence allowing troublesome components to be deactivated and claims better hardware detection. KDE is offered as an alternative GUI, although GNOME - now on its second release - is the recommended default.

Installation is quite easy. A boot floppy is provided, but the CD is bootable and  after a prompt launches straight into graphics mode. Like Corel LinuxOS, there’s an option to install Linux into a FAT filesystem if you want to keep Windows and don’t want to repartition your drive - although this reduces performance. The installer’s partitioning tool is pretty basic, though, and only FIPS (Federal Information Processing Standard) is supplied for non-destructive repartitioning; we recommend buying Partition Magic for this.

There is a selection of pre-configured installations, including server, GNOME and KDE workstations and a custom option which allows packages to be individually selected. The installer can update an existing Red Hat installation from version 2.0 upwards, which is a neat touch. We tried this on 6.0 and 6.1 installations and it worked well.

There were some niggles, though. On a recent notebook PC, all the hardware, including graphics, sound, PC Card slots, USB and power management was correctly detected and configured, but on an older Cyrix machine, vanilla NE2000 and SoundBlaster 16 cards were missed - although the 'Getting Started’ manual contained simple instructions on how to add them later.

[screenshot]
Red Hat 6.2 offers a choice of GUIs as well as a vast array of skins for that personal touch

Unless you choose a custom install, there’s no option as to where to install the LILO boot manager and it silently overwrote PowerQuest’s BootMagic.

You can choose whether to boot into text or graphics mode, but misconfiguration of the X server on the Cyrix desktop meant that graphics mode failed and had to be configured manually from the command line.

Once installed, the GNOME desktop is pretty good. There isn’t the same range of integrated accessories and utilities as with KDE, but a range of helpful non-GNOME tools is included and the GNOME tools include an excellent help system, file manager and a full spreadsheet, Gnumeric.

The choice of window managers and graphical 'skins’, wallpapers and screensavers is stunning: GNOME looks more attractive than KDE and is vastly more customisable. The desktop also holds links to helpful websites and local documentation and icons for CD and floppy drives. Ifyou choose to install KDE instead, or even alongside, you get only the default KDE desktop.

The basic version of Red Hat can be downloaded as a CD image from the company’s website or installed over the Internet. The Deluxe boxed edition adds 90 days oftelephone support, novice-level printed manuals and several additional CDs: documentation and source code as well as free 'PowerTools’ and commercial workstation applications. The Professional edition doubles the period of support, which also covers Apache configuration and includes more server-based tools.

Red Hat remains a solid distribution, but it no longer has the technological edge. SuSE is easier to install and includes vastly more software, Caldera is better integrated and has more corporate features and Corel, although immature, is the most user-friendly and Windows-like Linux around.

LIAM PROVEN


DETAILS

★★★

PRICE £64 (£54.47 ex VAT)

CONTACT Red Hat 01483 300169

http://europe.redhat.com/

SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS x86 processor with 16MB of RAM and 500MB of disk space
PROS Easier than ever; widely supported
CONS Poorer integration, features and user-friendliness than the competition
OVERALL Red Hat is the Linux baseline: if you’re already familiar with it, it’s still a sound choice, but other variants offer more
liam_on_linux: (Default)
2019-02-10 11:48 am

Did Ubuntu switch to GNOME prematurely?

A response to a Reddit question.

I can only agree with you. I have blogged and commented enough about this that I fear I am rather unpopular with the GNOME developer team these days. :-(

The direct reason for the sale is that in founder Mark Shuttleworth's view, Ubuntu's bug #0 has been closed. Windows is no longer the dominant OS. There are many more Linux server instances, and while macOS dominates the high-end laptop segment, in terms of user-facing OSes, Android is now dominant and it is based on the Linux kernel.

His job is done. He has helped to make Linux far more popular and mainstream than it was. Due to Ubuntu being (fairly inarguably, I'd say) the best desktop distro for quite a few years, all the other Linux vendors [disclaimer: including my employer] switched away from desktop distros and over to server distros, which is where the money is. The leading desktop is arguably now Mint, then the various Ubuntu flavours. Linux is now mainstream and high-quality desktop Linuxes are far more popular than ever and they're all freeware.

Shuttleworth used an all-FOSS stack to build Thawte. When he sold it to Verisign in 1999, he made enough that he'd never need to work again. Ubuntu was a way for Shuttleworth to do something for the Linux and FOSS world in return.

It's done.

Thus, Shuttleworth is preparing Ubuntu for an IPO and floatation on the public stock market. As part of this, the company asked the biggest techie community what they'd like to see happen: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14002821

The results were resounding. Drop all the Ubuntu-only projects and switch back to upstream ones. Sadly, this mostly means Red Hat-backed projects, as it is the upstream developer of systemd, PulseAudio, GNOME 3, Flatpak and much more.

Personally I am interested in non-Windows-like desktops. I think the fragmentation in the Linux desktop market has been immensely harmful, has destroyed the fragile unity (pun intended) that there was in the free Unix world, and the finger of blame can be firmly pointed at Microsoft, which did this intentionally. I wrote about this here: https://www.theregister.co.uk/Print/2013/06/03/thank_microsoft_for_linux_desktop_fail/

The Unity desktop came out of that, and that was a good thing. I never like GNOME 2 much and I don't use Maté. But Unity was a bit of a lash-up behind the scenes, apparently, based on a series of Compiz plugins. It was not super stable and it was hard to maintain. The unsuccessful Unity-2D fork was killed prematurely (IMHO), whereas Unity 8 (the merged touchscreen/desktop version) was badly late.

There were undeniably problems with the development approach. Ubuntu has always faced problems with Red Hat, the 800lb gorilla of FOSS. The only way to work with a RH-based project is to take it and do as your told. Shuttleworth has written about this.
https://www.markshuttleworth.com/archives/654
(See the links in that post too.)

Also, some contemporary analysis: https://www.osnews.com/story/24510/shuttleworth-seigo-gnomes-not-collaborating/

I am definitely not claiming that Ubuntu always does everything right! Even with the problems of working with GNOME, I suspect that Mir was a big mistake and that Ubuntu should have gone with Wayland.

Cinnamon seems to be sticking rather closer to the upstream GNOME base for its different desktop. Perhaps Unity should have been more closely based on GNOME 3 tech, in the same way.

But IMHO, Ubuntu was doing terrifically important work with Unity 8, and all that has come to nothing. Now the only real convergence efforts are the rather half-hearted KDE touchscreen work and the ChromeOS-on-tablet work from Google, which isn't all-FOSS anyway TTBOMK.

I am terribly disappointed they surrendered. They were so close.

I entirely agree with you: Unity was _the_ best Linux desktop, bar none. A lot of the hate was from people that never learned to use it properly. I have seen it castigated for lacking stuff that is basic built-in functionality that people never found how to use.

In one way, Unity reminded me of OS/2 2: "a better DOS than DOS, a better Windows than Windows." And it *was*! Unity was a better Mac OS X desktop than Mac OS X. I'm typing on a Mac now and there's plenty of things it can't do that Unity could. Better mouse actions. *Far* better keyboard controls.

I hope that the FOSS forks do eventually deliver.

Meantime, I reluctantly switched to Xfce. It's fine, it works, it's fast and simple, but it lacks functionality I really want.