liam_on_linux: (Default)
[personal profile] liam_on_linux
I had Sinclair Microdrives on my ZX Spectrum. They were better than tape cassette but nothing else -- ~90 kB of slowish, rather unreliable storage.

So I bought an MGT DISCiPLE and an old-fashioned, but new, cheap 5¼" 80-track, DS/DD drive in an external case.

780 kB of storage! On demand! Programs loaded in seconds! Even when I upgraded to an ex-demo 128K Spectrum from Curry's, even 128 kB programs loaded in a (literal) flash!

(MGT's firmware strobed the Spectrum's screen border, in homage to loading from tape, so you could see the data streaming into memory.)

That was the first time I remember being excited by the size and speed of my computer's storage.

After an interval on an Amstrad PCW9512 -- in hindsight a bit of an odd choice, really -- I got an Acorn Archimides A310. 1 megabyte of RAM and 20 meg of hard disk!

I was a bit less dazzled because what paid for it was my first job, so I was working on PCs. My work PC was an actual IBM PC-AT, 6MHz I think, with 512 kB of RAM and a 20 MB 5¼" hard disk the size and weight of half a breeze-block. I added a second 15MB drive for SCO Xenix.

But the Archie was about 4x faster than the fastest PC the company sold, an IBM PS/2 Model 70-H21, with a 25MHz 80386DX with cache. So what dazzled me about my Archie wasn't it vast epic tracts of storage -- I had that at work -- it was the blinding speed of the thing. My own 8MHz RISC workstation. BASIC apps that ran as quick as Z80 machine code on a Speccy or PCW.

That would be about 1989.

The next few weren't my own.

There was the first 3½ inch hard drive I saw. So tiny. 120MB in a fag packet. Amazing.

Then I remember the first 330MB hard disk at work -- another full-height 5¼" thing, but SO MUCH SPACE. It also cost a few months' pay, mind. And the custard's server OS ran on PC DOS 3.3, so I had to partition it into 32MB slices -- drives C:, D:, E:, F:, G:, H:, I:, J:, K: and L: with L being a tiddler of about 11MB.

I think everything since has been a bit of a let-down.

Until last year when I bought a used 1TB notebook HD from a chap on FesseBouc here in Brno. (He bought a new lappy and got them to bung an SSD in it), so he sold me a new, unused 1TB drive...

... for thirty quid.

I bought one for my big desktop-replacement laptop which was my main machine for my first year here. That and a 128GB SSD. Later they went in my Mac mini. But they cost real money in 2014.

But thirty quid? I've spent more than that on a curry. For this tiny thing, the size of a dozen business cards stacked up. Not worth keeping for him.

The 20-somethings in the pub that night were unable to understand why I was so boggled by this. A terabyte is a meaningless word to them -- it's a lot, it's 2-3x what their laptops hold, but not vast. No sense of size, I think.

It's equivalent to FIFTY THOUSAND of the first hard disks I ever used, probably a Seagate  ST-4026:



Here's a nice retrospective.

Only the top-end PC-AT came with a hard disk, they were that expensive. (OK, mine was about 4 years old when I inherited it.)

3 and a quarter kilos!

That little £30 1TB thing holds as much as 162,500 kilograms of the first hard disk I personally used.

More than a blue whale, more than 2 space shuttles.

And it's the price of a central London curry and smaller than the battery of my first mobile phone.
That was hard to handle.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

April 2026

S M T W T F S
   1234
56789 1011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated May. 17th, 2026 06:24 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios