liam_on_linux: (Default)
I really hate it whenever I see someone calling Apple fans fanboys or attacking Apple products as useless junk that only sells because it's fashionable.

Every hater is 100% as ignorant and wrong as any fanatically-loyal fanboy who won't consider anything else.

Let me try to explain why it's toxic.

If someone/some group are not willing to make the effort to see why a very successful product/family/brand is successful, then it prevents them from learning any lessons from that success. That means that the outgroup is unlikely to ever challenge the success.

In life it is always good to ask why. If this thing is so big, why? If people love it so much, why?

I use a cheap Chinese Android phone. It's my 3rd. I also have a cheap Chinese Android tablet that I almost never use. But last time I bought a phone, I had a Planet Computers Gemini on order, and I didn't want two new ChiPhones, so I bought a used iPhone. This was a calculated decision: the new model iPhones were out and dropped features I wanted. This meant the previous model was now quite cheap.

I still have that iPhone. It's a 6S+. It's the last model I'd want: it has a headphone socket and a physical home button. I like those. It's still updated and last week I put the latest iOS on it.

It allowed me to judge the 2020s iOS ecosystem. It's good. Most of the things I disliked about iOS 6 (the previous iPhone model I had) have been fixed now. Most of the apps can be replaced or customised. It's much more open than it was. The performance is good, the form factor is good, way better than my iPhone 4 was.

I don't use iPhones because I value things like expansion slots, multiple SIMs, standard ports and standard charging cables, and a customisable OS. I don't really use tablets at all.

But my main home desktop computer is an iMac. I am an expert Windows user and maintainer with 35 years' of experience with the platform. I am also a fairly expert Linux user and maintainer with 27 years' experience. I am a full-time Linux professional and have been for nearing a decade... because I am a long-term Windows expert and that is why I choose not to use it any more.

My iMac (2015 Retina 27") is the most gorgeous computer I've ever owned. It looks good, it's a joy to use, it is near silent and trouble-free to a degree that any Windows computer can only aspire to be. I don't need expansion slots and so on: I want the vendor to make a good choice, integrate it well and for it to just work and keep just working, and it does.

It is slim, unobtrusive for a large machine, silent, and the picture (and sound) quality is astounding.

I chose it because I have extensive knowledge of building, specifying, benchmarking, reviewing, fixing, supporting, networking, deploying, and recycling old PCs. It is over 3 decades of expert knowledge of PCs and Windows that is why I spent my own money on a Mac.

So every time someone calls Mac owners fanboys, I know they know less than me and therefore I feel entirely entitled to dump on their ignorance from a great height.

I do not use iDevices. I also do not use Apple laptops. I don't like their keyboards, I don't like their pointing devices, I don't like their hard-to-repair designs. I use old Thinkpads, like most experienced geeks.

But I know why people love them, and if one wishes to pronounce edicts about Apple kit, you had better bloody well know your stuff.

I do not recommend them for everyone. Each person has their own needs and should learn and judge appropriately. But I also do not condemn them out of hand.

I have put in an awful lot of Windows boxes over the years. I have lost large potential jobs when I recommended Windows solutions to Mac houses, because it was the best tool for the job. I have also refused large jobs from people who wanted, say, Windows Server or Exchange Server when it *wasn't* the right tool for the job.

It was my job to assess this stuff.

Which equips me well to know that every single time someone decries Apple stuff, that means that they haven't done the work I have. They don't know and they can't bothered to learn.
liam_on_linux: (Default)
Everyone hated the Win8 UI. I used it for a couple of months, until it timed-out and wanted to be activated – at which point I went back to Ubuntu. I learned Windows on a machine with no mouse – at the end of the 1980s, my employers didn't own a single PC mouse – so I drive it using the keyboard far more heavily than most sighted people. Launch an app: Win+R, binary name, enter: Win+R, control, enter. Win+R, cmd, enter. Not sure of the binary name? Win key, type a few letters, glance to check, return. Same UI as Spotlight on a Mac. I didn't care that there wasn't a Start menu, or that the launcher was full-screen. I barely saw it.


I had a brief play with a couple of Win8 tablets and several phones. It was actually a bloody good touchscreen interface, more powerful and capable than either iOS or Android, and with some good touches taken from Blackberry 10 and the short-lived Palm WebOS.
Resizable gadgets that convey live info without opening the app. Gestures to summon launcher and switcher without wasting any screen space – swipe onto the screen from different edges.

At the time, I too thought tablets were manifestly going to be the future. MS has made good business from betting the farm on the next gen of tech. WinNT was barely usable on the contemporary 1993 kit – it was designed for 1998 tech. Win2000 was designed for 2003-4 kit.

But tablet makers didn't deliver. Apple sat on its hands: iPads got slimmer, faster, higher-res and with more storage, and nothing else. Google failed to commit: Android Honeycomb looked good, but almost all the big-screen UI enhancements were gradually dropped from later Android versions. Why? No answer ever came. Hardware makers didn't produce tablets with lots of ports, multiple storage media, and expandability – all the things laptops had. So everyone bought a tablet & then kept it, because the later models weren't much better. They got replaced when dropped or when the battery failed. Massive early adoption then it flatlined.

The Win8 interface was genuinely very good, if you had a touchscreen. But the hardware didn't follow suit, so it was beached, high and dry, on mouse-and-keyboard desktops and half-assed laptops with touchscreens.

If your hands are on a keyboard and your thumbs on a trackpad, then it becomes better to make the trackpad multitouch and give it rich gestures -- which is what Apple did. I've been using OS X since v10.0. I'm typing on it right now. The way kids with it use multitouch is amazing. No menu bar, no dock, no "desktop" as such, just fast fluid gestures to flip from fullscreen-app to fullscreen-app, or flip to a tiled overview of all of them then zoom back in. It's a mode of usage from someone with a high-end laptop and nothing else (partly because the laptops are so expensive, of course) and it's profoundly different to desktop windows-icons-mouse-pointer usage. You simply can't do this stuff with a mouse.

Apple were right: don't bolt a touchscreen onto a laptop. You get "gorilla arm", constantly moving the hands away from their natural position, etc.

Or, just make it all screen. Segment your market on whether people want expansion etc.

This left MS in a corner, so it had to DIY. The Surface devices are the result. Everyone I know who has one loves it. But it was too little too late to change the course of the whole industry.

Google is experimenting with ChromeOS tablets, but it's crippled because the good kit is coming from China – behind the Great Firewall, with no Google, so ChromeOS can't work. Chuwi could make amazing Chromebooks -- they have cheapo convertible Surface-like tablets, running both Windows and Android, on the same device if you wish. But they're in China so they can't adopt ChromeOS.

The PC market has always been driven by price. Some loyalists will pay thousands for a Surface, just as others will for an iPad Pro or MacBook Pro. I won't. I am a keyboard fetishist (apparently) and I'm also cheap, so I use 2nd hand Thinkpads with good keyboards that still work fine.

I have a Chuwi tablet, a Hi9 Air. It was £250 new, with tax & duty, for the spec of a £1000 Apple or Samsung at the time. It's 3Y old & still fine.

If I could have a convertible ChromeBook with a high spec for that kind of money, I'd try it. But I can't. I can have disposable plastic crap, or I need to pay £1000 or something absurd for a Pixel. Yeah, no. Hard no.


And of course the Linux desktop is woefully neglected and nobody is even seriously trying tablet operations. What do you expect? These folks like stuff like Vi, Emacs and tiling window managers. They took years to adopt anti-aliasing. Only Canonical had the vision to go for a converged desktop/tablet/phone UI, but bloody HackerNews didn't like it, so they ditched it. IMHO the only mistake they made was going for their own display server – Mir was a step too far. Wayland was already clearly the future. If Unity 8 had run on Wayland, they might not have been stretched so thin and they might have got it out the door in reasonable time.
liam_on_linux: (Default)
[A chap on a mailing list I'm on talked about being unable to find the "Shutdown" option on Windows 8, and how while he and a friend couldn't work out how to "use Twitter" in over half an hour, his mother worked it out in five minutes.]

I've fallen victim to the "trying to be too clever" PEBCAK error myself, a good few times.
(E.g. I spent ages trying to work out the command to tell my first Apple Newton to shut down. Eventually I consulted the manual. Press the on/off button, it said. I think I actually blushed.)
I tried to learn from it. I don't always win.
Shutdown options are like a "sleep" option on a notebook. You don't need one. Just close the lid.ExpandRead more... )

May 2025

S M T W T F S
    12 3
45678910
11121314151617
1819 2021222324
25262728293031

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

Expand All Cut TagsCollapse All Cut Tags
Page generated Jun. 18th, 2025 09:17 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios