> Do you think it's worth editing the text with your points?
Thank you for offering this option, that's very thoughtful of you. Where I discuss translation, that was prompted by your remark "I have no way to judge how accurate it [the translation / the LLM] is." Perhaps add a note that there's one commenter who says the translation is mostly accurate, the mistranslated points are mostly minor matters of emphasis, and see his comment for some examples?
Edit: But it also works when my remark stays in the comments. When it comes to machine translations, nothing wrong with telling readers to stay on their toes :D
Re: The book's previous chapter has photographs of the ARRA and ARMAC
Date: 2024-07-27 05:06 pm (UTC)Thank you for offering this option, that's very thoughtful of you. Where I discuss translation, that was prompted by your remark "I have no way to judge how accurate it [the translation / the LLM] is." Perhaps add a note that there's one commenter who says the translation is mostly accurate, the mistranslated points are mostly minor matters of emphasis, and see his comment for some examples?
Edit: But it also works when my remark stays in the comments. When it comes to machine translations, nothing wrong with telling readers to stay on their toes :D